Doctor Who Retro Review: Serial 014—The Crusade
By T. Scott Edwards
Now this is more like it! After the sci-fi
silliness of The Web Planet – a blog
for which turned out to be incredibly divisive, so sorry if you're a fan and so
hated my blog! – we return to Earth, slap-bang in the middle of 12th-century Palestine, and the third crusade. The
Crusade is written by former script editor David Whittaker, for the first
time moving away from the 2-episode fillers he had been associated with, and
directed by the magnificent Douglas Camfield, who had before now only worked on
the third part of Planet of giants,
but would go on to direct some of Doctor
Who's greatest serials, including The
Seeds of Doom and Terror of the
Zygons. This serial is a rich, grand piece, similar to Marco Polo in tone and feel, telling of the involvement of the
Doctor and his companions in King Richard's invasion of Palestine in the name
of God.
From the
outset, there is a change in style from the last serial – the sets are
luxurious and rich in design, believable, and the action kicks off straight
away. Upon introducing the lurking faces of the Palestinian horde, we cut to a
wonderful scene between Richard – played by the magnificent Julian glover,
quite a catch for the time – and his men, discussing the invasion in
metaphorical terms with a beautiful hawk. The dialogue flows beautifully, and
these are the most realistic non-regulars since The Reign of Terror. Each character is given his own nuances and
inflections, rather than start caricature, and we can already see the danger
which lurks beneath Richard's civilised exterior – he is stubborn, almost
childish, and determined to get what he wants. He waves away the concerns of
his men nonchalantly.
When we
see the TARDIS crew leave their ship, there is a look of despondency about it
all, which is wonderful. Following the harrowing events of the previous few
weeks, Ian looks dishevelled and tired, glancing furtively about as though
desperately trying to avoid trouble. This is William Russell's serial, really,
and his strand of the storyline is magnificently delivered by Russell.
Within
seconds of the crew arriving in the forest, they are ambushed, and Barbara is
kidnapped. I feel genuinely sorry for Jacqueline Hill in some respects; it
doesn't seem to matter where they are, there is always some element of sexual
danger involved. Hill is, as always, magnificent, and the scenes in the harem
are wonderful, as are her scenes with Bernard Kay's Saladin. His fascination
with her, due to her appearance and posture, as well as her evidently educated
stature, is wonderfully handled, and Hill's guarded responses are entirely
responsible for this.
The fight
sequence in the woods is wonderful – after the awkward posturing of the Zarbi
and Menoptra the week before, and their stilted fight sequences as each had to
carefully position themselves due to their costume, here there is something
brutal and guttural about the sequence. There seems to be a genuine, palpable
threat involved. The capture of William, pretending to be King Richard, is
excellently handled – the look of delight on the faces of the Saracens is
perfectly handled, and John Flint's delivery as William is equally
well-managed; we can tell that he is terrified, yet is doing what is right for
his king. When he and Barbara discuss his false identity in their cell, the
glee he shows is fantastic.
What is
fascinating with this particular serial is the way in which Saladin and Richard
are portrayed. Whereas in The Reign of
Terror certain characters from history had to be allowed to remain as they
were, and as such became rather dull, with the crew unable to alter anything,
here Whittaker does the exact opposite. Kay's Saladin is magnificent – he is
noble and virtuous, dangerous yet educated and not led by baser instincts. In
contrast, we have Glover's performance as King Richard, who comes across as
brash, easily swayed by whims and volatile, an unreliable, and therefore
dangerous, character whom the crew must be wary of. The cliffhanger for the
first episode is, therefore, filled with genuine danger – Richard stubbornly
refuses to assist the TARDIS crew in any way, arguing that he would never trade
with Saracen scum like Saladin.
El Akir,
played with aplomb and oozing danger by Walter Randall, is the central villain
of the piece. After being tricked into delivering William des Preaux and
Barbara to Saladin, he is determined to have his vengeance – and so he does. The
second episode deals with three separate storylines, splitting the group from 2
to 3 with ease – Barbara is still with the Saracens, but now Ian is sent to
fetch her whilst the Doctor and Vicki deal with Richard. For the third serial
in a row, Vicki is something of a sidekick to Hartnell's Doctor – such as with
the theft of the clothing in episode 1 – and she works wonderfully beside him. It
is she who sees the dangers of what they are doing, she who becomes our eyes and ears as a viewer. In the
first season, Barbara and Ian were our identifiable presence – thrown into the
adventures as outsiders. The companion has a vital role, one which we only
fully appreciate when they are utterly incapacitated or missing entirely, as in
The Deadly Assassin. In season 2,
though, the two contemporary teachers are utterly used to these adventures,
whilst Vicki, despite being from the future, is our voice – she airs her
concerns, and she deals with the Doctor in every way. Maureen O'Brien is
wonderful at these comedic scenes, as she was in The Romans.
What is
fascinating about this serial is that unlike all previous historicals, it is
delivered at a breakneck speed. Whilst The
Romans dealt with the events of a mere few days, and The Reign of Terror showed the length of time by cutting to
location filming of someone like
Hartnell walking in the countryside, here no effort is made to cover the scope.
In the four-episode format, no time is wasted on travel – a character needs to
get somewhere, and so they arrive within a few minutes. It keeps the pace
ticking over wonderfully, yet somehow doesn't jeopardise characterisation.
Episode 3
is simply magnificent – Jean Marsh positively revels in her part as Joanna,
sister of Richard, and her "quandary" is heartfelt and painful to
watch. Her lines about something "new" in the Doctor, yet "older
than the sky itself" is magnificent, and her part in the redressing of
Vicki, and the chamberlain's disgust at Vicki's pretence is hilarious. The
scene that follows, between Hartnell and O'Brien, is touching too – her
concerns that the Doctor will leave her, and that the TARDIS is the only home
she has, is beautifully underplayed – O'Brien's staccato delivery resonates
perfectly. Indeed, the scene between Richard and Joanna is simply magnificent –
she refuses to be used as a pawn in the eternal game between the Saracens and
the invading forces. Saladin's realisation of the use of this marriage shows
his intelligence – "hold one hand out in friendship, but keep the other on
your sword" is insightful and realistic. The Doctor's argument with
Leicester is rather unnerving – the Doctor winds him up, yet unfairly so. Leicester
is evidently a brave and intelligent man. His argument is sound. And yet the
Doctor goads him, calling him a fool, to cause ructions throughout the court.
Barbara's
assistance from Haroun, played with heart-wrenching realism by George Little,
is stunning. The fear and emotion his voice carries are terrifically moving,
and we cannot help but realise that, whilst he is assisting Barbara for his own
reasons – to kill El Akir – the crew are, as always, making things worse for
the innocent bystanders of their time. That he is so determined that his
daughter should be killed rather than fall into the hands of the deadly,
monstrous El Akir is terrifying – we realise that the threat of sexual
molestation suddenly has even more resonance if this is the length to which
someone is willing to go. Safiya's innocence makes it all the more distressing.
The sounds from outside of women screaming and crying are equally unnerving,
and Jacqueline Hill's face as she glances at the knife whilst embracing Safiya
is wonderfully realised. Her sacrifice to keep Safiya safe is beautifully
delivered as she steps out to keep the soldiers from burning the house down. Throughout,
we can hear soldiers knocking on the doors of more and more civilians. Once
brought before El akir, we are reminded of the danger he embodies, as he tells
her that the only pleasure left for her is death, "and that is very far
away". It is horrifying, and Jacqueline Hill sells this very real threat
magnificently.
Ian,
meanwhile, is having just as bad a time of it as Barbara – robbed whilst laid
in the desert, and then staked to the ground, smeared with honey and left for
the ants to burrow into his flesh. The torture rings true to the time, and is
horrifically shocking for that very reason. The comedy with which Tutte Lemkow
delivers the lines underlies the danger, creating a dark undertone. This is
only one of the very adult themes underlying episode 4, thinly veiled to
protect the child viewers. The scene in the harem, with Fatima's betrayal for
one ruby, is awful – and her demise, if that is what happens, is equally
horrific, with the other women rounding on her in complete silence. Likewise,
Maimuna's realisation that her father is on his way to rescue her is
heartbreaking – she didn't believe he would, since she has been raped by El
Akir and is therefore no longer pure.
Also
during episode 4, we have Hartnell's plotline rushing to its conclusion, with
the argument between Leicester reaching a head. Richard's interruption, as he
prays he shall one day see Jerusalem, is wonderful – and again, the Doctor
confides in Vicki that he could not tell Richard the truth, and interfere in
history – these are the ground rules set out from the very beginning of the series,
and reinforced in The Aztecs. Historicals
often do not work for this very reason – the lessons therein are fixed points,
and in an educational remit, the series must be truthful to that. As such,
episode 4 is interesting in that the focus is removed from Saladin and Richard
almost entirely – Richard appears in this one scene, and Saladin does not
appear at all. Instead, the plot is shifted to the less significant characters
– El Akir must be judged and dealt with, Haroun should find his daughter safe
and well, and the crew should return to the TARDIS safe and well. As with the
portrayal of Robespierre (which I am conscious is a parallel I am frequently
drawing) it is essential that the true protagonists of the period continue in
their way forever. The TARDIS crew can have no real impact upon events unless
they arrive in the final days of an event (as with Robespierre's downfall).
So Ian
manages to free himself and is taken by Ibrahim to rescue Barbara from El Akir's
harem in Lydda. Ibrahim is a wonderful caricature of the slimy, wheedling thief
– what is interesting is that he is the first caricature that we have really
met, throughout all of 12th-century Palestine, yet he actually
becomes a temporary companion for Ian. He is a comedic part, intriguing and
amusing, despite the brutal truth that he was willing to sit idly by and watch
Ian die, and has probably done the same to hundreds of other travellers in his
time. He is not a nice person, but in this time no one was particularly nice –
morals are ambiguous in this era, and so characters can get away with
disgusting acts. When Ibrahim refers to El Akir as a "very bad man",
Ian retorts "not the only one around here", a knowing acceptance that
in this morally ambiguous time, few people can be trusted.
Whilst
Barbara and Maimuna plan their escape, and are betrayed by Fatima, Haroun
arrives outside, in readiness to take revenge against El Akir. That El Akir's
death is so quick is fitting; he is allowed no final words, no eulogising – he
simply sinks to his knees, his sword in his hand about to attack the two women,
and the focus is, instead, upon the familial reunion. Thanks to Ibrahim, Ian
and Barbara have acquired horses, and are able to return to the TARDIS to meet
up with the Doctor and Vicki. The Earl of Leicester's men are watching the
TARDIS, fearful that the Doctor is a traitor, and apparently being proved
right.
The
conclusion to the fourth episode seems a little transitory and rushed, really,
but that isn't a bad thing – everything is wound up before then and it is only
the subplot involving the Doctor and Leicester's rivalry which needs resolution
– and this resolution comes in the form of Ian, thanks to Richard's knighting
of him in episode 2. Deceptively overthrowing the power of Leicester, claiming
that it is his right to dispatch the Doctor for treachery, before taking him
into the clearing where the TARDIS is set. Whilst the crew jovially discuss
this, though, it is mildly disturbing that Leicester and his men are left to drop
to their knees, crossing themselves – they have just seen "poor Sir Ian,
spirited away" – their faith is being tested, unnervingly, by the crew
themselves, who take great delight in it.
Scott Edwards is a teacher of English and Theatre Studies at Barnard Castle School in the North East of England, with a BAHons in English Literature and Film Studies. He is also a self-professed ‘ming-mong,' and in addition to http://timelordapprentice.blogspot.co.uk/ he also runs http://www.facebook.com/Classic.Doctor.Who. You can also follow him on Twitter: @TimelordTSE.
Labels: Doctor Who, Guest Blog, review, T. Scott Edwards
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home